The US has paved the way for imposing tariffs of up to 100% on all countries that continue to purchase crude oil or natural gas from Russia

India’s exports have come under renewed focus after the US Senate passed the Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia Act, legislation that could pave the way for tariffs of up to 100 percent on imports into the United States from countries that continue purchasing Russian-origin crude oil or natural gas.

The bill faces further legislative and executive steps before becoming law.

The proposed legislation grants the US President power to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent on goods imported from countries that are among the five largest buyers of Russian crude oil or natural gas and continue making new purchases after the law takes effect. It also targets countries found to be facilitating Russian sanctions evasion.

US President Donald Trump in recent days has extended support to the bill. The bill passed the US Senate on Friday with bipartisan support with only 11 senators voting against it.

For India, the timing is significant.

Data from commodity analytics firm Kpler shows India’s imports of Russian crude climbed to a record 2.78 million barrels per day (bpd) in July, up 1.5 percent from June. Russian oil accounted for more than half of India’s total crude imports, underscoring Moscow’s position as New Delhi’s dominant supplier.

india’s overall crude oil imports stood at 4.96 million bpd during the month.

The surge in Russian purchases came as escalating geopolitical tensions in the Gulf and the Red Sea disrupted cargo flows from West Asia.

The proposed US legislation could significantly raise the stakes for countries such as India and China, which have emerged as the largest buyers of Russian crude since Western sanctions redirected Moscow’s exports away from Europe.

Section 113 of the bill specifically calls for duties of up to 100 percent on imports from countries that remain among the top five importers of Russian crude or natural gas and continue making purchases after enactment. The legislation also requires periodic reviews every 180 days to reassess the list of countries covered.

Section 115, however, authorises the President to waive the application of provisions of the Act if the President determines that doing so is in the national security interests of the United States.

For India, the implications extend beyond energy security. The US is India’s largest export market, and any punitive tariffs could affect sectors ranging from engineering goods and pharmaceuticals to textiles and electronics if the legislation is ultimately enacted and applied.

New Delhi was able to escape higher tariffs under the Forced Labour provisions with Washington levying 10 percent additional duty on Indian goods against the proposed 12.5 percent for other countries.

This is how much money it takes to be rich in the US In 2025

In 2025, Americans say you need a net worth of $2.3 million to be considered wealthy, down from $2.5 million in 2024. By region: West $3 million, Northeast $2.4 million, Midwest $2.1 million, South $1.8 million. Financial comfort requires $839K on average, ranging from $1.1 million in the West to $615K in the South. While 44% define wealth by money, 45% cite happiness, and 4 in 5 feel rich in non-financial ways.

Trump’s Bold Tax Proposal: Exempting Americans Earning Below $150,000 from Federal Income Tax

Trump’s Major Tax Reform Proposal

President Donald Trump has proposed a major tax reform that would eliminate federal income tax for individuals earning less than $150,000 annually (approximately 21.3 crore). The plan, which aligns with Trump’s longstanding push for tax cuts, was confirmed by Commerce Secretary Howard Latnik in a recent interview.

“I know what his goal is – no tax for anybody who makes less than $150,000 a year. That’s his goal, and that’s what I’m working for,” Latnik stated, emphasizing the administration’s commitment to tax relief for middle-class Americans.

Trump’s Tax Cut Plan

  • No federal income tax for individuals earning below $150,000 annually
  • Abolition of tip taxes, easing tax burdens on service workers
  • $4.5 trillion in proposed tax cuts, aimed at businesses and individuals alike
  • Introduction of a $5 million “Golden Visa” program, expected to bring in additional revenue
  • Targeting offshore tax frauds, to offset potential losses from tax reductions

Concerns Over US Debt & Funding

Trump’s tax cut agenda is expected to provide financial relief to millions of Americans, but critics have raised concerns over the surging national debt and the economic impact of such large-scale cuts. Some experts fear that eliminating income tax for a large portion of the population could widen the country’s fiscal deficit.

However, Commerce Secretary Latnik dismissed these concerns, asserting that the revenue gap would be filled by other sources. “Other people, not Americans, will foot the bill,” he claimed, suggesting that cracking down on offshore tax frauds could provide the government with the funds needed to sustain public programs.

Golden Visa Program & Senate Vote

To supplement the tax cuts, Trump’s team is also pushing for a $5 million Golden Visa program, which would grant residency to foreign investors contributing to the U.S. economy. The next step for this plan is a vote in the Senate. Lawmakers will decide whether to approve or reject Trump’s tax proposal. While some politicians support tax cuts, others are worried about how they will impact the economy and whether they could increase the national debt.

CANADA (ONTARIO) 25% TAX ON US ELECTRICITY EXPORTS

The Canadian province of Ontario has implemented a 25% surcharge on electricity exports to the United States, escalating trade tensions between the neighboring regions. The move is a direct response to recent trade actions taken by the U.S., and is expected to significantly impact electricity costs for consumers and businesses in several U.S. states.  

Key Highlights:

  Ontario’s Action: 

  • Ontario has imposed a 25% surcharge on electricity exports to the United States.   
  • This move is a direct response to trade tensions, particularly those stemming from U.S. trade policies.   

  Impacted Areas: 

  • The surcharge affects U.S. states that receive electricity from Ontario, including Michigan, Minnesota, and New York.   
  • The increase in cost will likely be passed on to consumers and businesses in those states.

The surcharge, effective immediately, will apply to all electricity transmitted from Ontario’s power grid to the U.S. This primarily affects states such as Michigan, Minnesota, and New York, which rely on Ontario for a portion of their electricity supply.   

This decision was not made lightly,” stated a representative from the Ontario government. However, in light of the recent trade measures imposed by the U.S., we felt it necessary to take action to protect Ontario’s interests.”

The provincial government has indicated that the surcharge is designed to offset the economic impact of U.S. trade policies on Ontario’s economy. Officials have also warned that they are prepared to take further measures, including increasing the surcharge or halting electricity exports altogether, if the trade dispute intensifies.   

The impact of the surcharge is expected to be felt directly by U.S. consumers and businesses, who will likely see increased electricity bills. Utility companies in the affected states are now assessing the potential impact and exploring options to mitigate the cost increase.   

The move has drawn mixed reactions from industry experts. Some argue that it is a necessary step to protect Ontario’s economic interests, while others express concern about the potential for escalating trade tensions and the impact on cross-border energy cooperation.

Ontario provides electricity to Minnesota, New York and Michigan; Quebec is also considering taking similar measures with electricity exports to the U.S.; about 60% of U.S. crude oil imports are from Canada, and 85% of U.S. electricity imports as well

Disclaimer:  Every effort has been made to avoid errors or omissions in this material. In spite of this, errors may creep in. Any mistake, error or discrepancy noted may be brought to our notice which shall be taken care of in the next edition. In no event the author shall be liable for any direct, indirect, special or incidental damage resulting from or arising out of or in connection with the use of this information.