Police and GST Department cannot issue notices to Advocate appearing for the Client

The Himangshu Kumar Ray Vs State of West Bengal case at the Calcutta High Court raises questions about the police and GST Department’s authority to issue notices to advocates. ➡️ The case highlights the importance of protecting client-advocate privilege under Sections 126 and 129 of the Evidence Act. ➡️ Authorities mistakenly issued notices to advocates, […]

The Himangshu Kumar Ray Vs State of West Bengal case at the Calcutta High Court raises questions about the police and GST Department’s authority to issue notices to advocates.

➡️ The case highlights the importance of protecting client-advocate privilege under Sections 126 and 129 of the Evidence Act.

➡️ Authorities mistakenly issued notices to advocates, misinterpreting the court’s original order, which the court deemed “wholly illegal.”

➡️ The court provided guidelines for proper investigation procedures, emphasizing the need for thorough assessment before taking legal action.

➡️ Ultimately, the case underscores the significance of respecting legal boundaries and upholding the privacy and rights of both advocates and their clients.

[MAT/1054/2023  – IA NO. CAN/1/2023, CAN/2/2023]

TAX CONCEPT

Tax Concept is a dedicated team of financial writers, legal analysts, and tax professionals committed to breaking down complex Indian corporate updates. From real-time GST amendments and crucial Income Tax judgements to EPFO schemes and corporate law updates, TaxConcept serves as a reliable, authoritative guide for chartered accountants, businesses, and everyday taxpayers seeking absolute compliance clarity.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from TAX CONCEPT

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading