Insights from ITAT Chennai on Key Tax Additions and Deductions

The ITAT Chennai addressed key tax issues for the assessment year 2015-16, involving export commission, goodwill depreciation, and various additions. The tribunal partially allowed appeals regarding goodwill depreciation and certain capital gains, while dismissing others. Key takeaways include the applicability of Supreme Court decisions and the principle of real income in taxation.

Tax Additions and Deductions

ITAT CHENNAI: KEY TAX ISSUES – AY 2015-16

EXPORT COMMISSION, GOODWILL DEPRECIATION & OTHER ADDITIONS

FORUM
ITAT, Chennai
(Cross Appeals)
DATE OF ORDER
08.07.2026
ASSESSMENT YEAR
2015-16
APPELLANTS
Assessee
& Revenue

KEY SECTIONS: 9, 40(a)(i), 32(1)(ii), 68, 115JB, 250

BACKGROUND

• Assessee is engaged in manufacturing of processed sand, dolomite, float glass, automotive glass, mirror glass etc.

• Return filed on 30.11.2020 declaring Nil income after set off of brought forward loss of ₹65,04,99,021/- and book profit of ₹2,22,28,82,391/- u/s 115JB.

• Case selected for scrutiny; TP reference made. TP adjustment of ₹30,19,88,344/-.

• AO made several additions/disallowances and assessed income at ₹226,14,19,998/-.

• CIT(A) granted partial relief. • Both sides in appeal before the Tribunal.

TRIBUNAL’S OVERALL DECISION

  • Delay in filing appeal condoned.
  • Grounds 1 & 2 (legal issues) dismissed.
  • Grounds 3 to 6 allowed.
  • Grounds 7 & 8 consequential; dismissed.

Grounds 9 & 10 dismissed.Appeal partly allowed.
Order pronounced on 08th July, 2026.

GROUNDISSUEASSESSEE’S CONTENTIONNTRIBUNAL’S FINDING & DECISION
1Disallowance of Export Commission u/s 40(a)(i)• Payment to Saint Gobain Exprover, Belgium for export commission not taxable in India.
• Benefit under Most Favourable Nation (MFN) clause under DTAA with Belgium.
AR fairly conceded that in view of Hon’ble Supreme Court decision in A.O (International Taxation) vs. Nestle SA [2023] 458 ITR 756 (SC), issue to be decided against the assessee.

DECISION: DISMISSED
2Depreciation on Goodwill u/s 32(1)(ii)• Goodwill arose on amalgamation of 4 companies.
• Covered by Hon’ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd. [2012] 348 ITR 302 (SC).
• Coord. Bench and CIT(A) in assessee’s own case for AY 2016-17 allowed the depreciation; Revenue appeal dismissed.
• Following decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court and consistent view of coordinate benches.
• Working of goodwill and depreciation accepted (details in table below).

DECISION: ALLOWED
3 to 5Computation of LTCG (Transfer of Land under JDA – Timing)• JDA dated 05.02.2016.
• Clause (5) requires removal of encumbrances (MSEB DP box, electricity lines, drainage etc.) before possession to developer.
• Encumbrances not removed in AY 2015-16.
• Commencement Certificate: 01.01.2020.
• RERA Registration: 14.12.2020.
• No possession handed over in AY 2015-16; no flats received.
• No transfer of capital asset during AY 2015-16 as per Section 2(47).
• No capital gain can arise in absence of transfer u/s 45.
• Relied on:
  – CIT-9 v. Eastern Ceramics Ltd. (Bom HC)
  – Balasaheb Popatrao Phadol v. ITO (ITAT Pune).

DECISION: ALLOWED
6Addition of Credit Card Payments & Investment (₹2,25,040 & ₹444)• Payments made through banking channel from income duly reported.• Assessee established by evidence that payments were through banking channel and from disclosed income.

DECISION: ALLOWED
7 & 8Interest u/s 234A & 234B & Other Consequential Issues• Consequential to deletion of additions.• Consequential; no separate adjudication required.

DECISION: DISMISSED
9 & 10Other Grounds• Various other grounds.• No merit.

DECISION: DISMISSED

GOODWILL – WORKING ACCEPTED BY TRIBUNAL

Particulars

Goodwill on Amalgamation of Saint-Gobain Gyproc Ltd. w.e.f. 01.04.2013
Goodwill on Amalgamation of Saint-Gobain SEVA Engineering Ltd. w.e.f. 01.04.2013
TOTAL GOODWILL (A) [2,45,03,15,307 + 2,47,54,683]*
Less: Depreciation @ 25%
WDV as on 01.04.2014 (B)
Goodwill on SEPR Refractories India Pvt. Ltd.
Goodwill on Saint-Gobain Crystals & Detectors India Ltd.
TOTAL GOODWILL FOR DEPRECIATION (C)
[B + 2,69,61,49,719 + 36,41,87,244]

DEPRECIATION @ 25% (C × 25%)

KEY TAKEAWAYS

▪ MFN benefit cannot override when issue is decided by Supreme Court contrary to assessee’s claim.

▪ Depreciation on goodwill allowable following CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd. (SC) and coordinate benches.

▪ Under JDA, no transfer without handing over possession and fulfilment of conditions.
No transfer u/s 2(47) ⇒ No capital gain u/s 45.

▪ Additions for credit card payments and investments deleted when paid through banking channel from disclosed income.

▪ Real income principle prevails; notional income cannot be taxed.

Note: The document text mentions goodwill claimed as ₹1,22,91,83,652, whereas the detailed working table computes depreciation as ₹1,22,91,59,864. Tribunal accepted the working in the table.

Radhika Goyal

Radhika Goyal is Author of Taxconcept Gurugram head office, for deeply reported tax, gst and income tax articles on issues that matter. He splits her time between New Delhi and Bengaluru, and has worked as a reporter, a podcaster and an editor for publications across India.

Reply

Scroll to Top

Discover more from TAX CONCEPT

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading