ITAT
ITAT

Landmark Decision: Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund Eligible for Income Tax Exemption

In a significant ruling, the Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has determined that the Central Act does not apply to the Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund, rendering it eligible for income tax exemption. The bench, comprising of Manu Kumar Giri (Judicial Member) and S. R. Raghunatha (Accountant Member), highlighted that the fund was established prior to the formation of the Central Act, the Advocate’s Welfare Fund Act, 2001. Additionally, it was emphasized that the saving clause provided under Section 38 of the Advocate’s Welfare Fund Act, 2001, exempts the fund from the applicability of the Central Act in the state of Tamil Nadu. Notably, the respondent/assessee, Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (TNAWF), was created under Section 6(2) of the Advocates Act 1961 and constituted by the state legislature under the Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund Act 1987 as the Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund Trust Committee.

The Welfare Fund Committee was formed with the objective of advancing the profession of advocacy in Tamil Nadu, offering benefits to advocates upon the cessation of practice and addressing related welfare matters. It is important to note that the respondent fund operates as a benevolent and welfare fund with no profit-oriented motives. The Tribunal observed that the fund is a benevolent and welfare fund with no intent or objective of profit. The major sources of income for the fund include the sale of welfare fund stamps, lifetime subscriptions from members, interest on corpus and earmarked deposits, grants from the state, and other related miscellaneous income.

The case arose when the Assessing Officer denied the exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, citing the proviso to Section 2(15), due to the sale of welfare fund stamps being perceived as a commercial activity. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] ruled in favor of the fund, acknowledging the advancement of other objects of general public utility through the sale of welfare fund stamps.

Subsequently, the department contested the decision of the CIT(A), arguing that the exemption under Section 11 should not have been granted, particularly due to the revenue generated from the sale of welfare fund stamps. Nevertheless, the tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed the department’s appeal, affirming the fund’s exemption from income tax.

This ruling sets a significant precedent, reaffirming the eligibility of the Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund for income tax exemption, and recognizing its noble objectives in supporting the welfare of advocates in the state.

Case Details:

  • Counsel For Appellant: D. Hema Bhupal
  • Counsel For Respondent: M.K. Rangaswamy
  • Case Title: Income Tax Officer Versus Tamilnadu Advocate Welfare Fund
  • Case No.: ITA Nos.: 699 & 700/Chny/2024
  • Read the Full Order Here

This decision marks a significant milestone in the legal landscape, recognizing and preserving the unique status of the Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund in the realm of income tax regulations.

Radhika Goyal is Author of Taxconcept Gurugram head office, for deeply reported tax, gst and income tax articles on issues that matter. He splits her time between New Delhi and Bengaluru, and has worked...