Bombay High Court’s Judgement on Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act: CIT vs Reliance Infocomm Ltd

COURT: Bombay High Court CORAM: Akil Kureshi J, M. S. Sanklecha J SECTION(S): 9(1)(vi) GENRE: International Tax CATCH WORDS: India-Netherlands DTAA, Retrospective amendment, royalty COUNSEL: J.D. Mistri DATE: February 5, 2019 (Date of pronouncement) DATE: June 8, 2019 (Date of publication) CITATION: Section 9(1)(vi) ‘Royalty’: The insertions of Explanations 5 & 6 to s. 9(1)(vi) […]

JUDGEMENT

COURT: Bombay High Court

CORAM: Akil Kureshi J, M. S. Sanklecha J

SECTION(S): 9(1)(vi)

GENRE: International Tax

CATCH WORDS: India-Netherlands DTAA, Retrospective amendment, royalty

COUNSEL: J.D. Mistri

DATE: February 5, 2019 (Date of pronouncement)

DATE: June 8, 2019 (Date of publication)

CITATION:

Section 9(1)(vi) ‘Royalty’: The insertions of Explanations 5 & 6 to s. 9(1)(vi) by the Finance Act 2015 w.r.e.f. 01.04.1976, even if declaratory and clarificatory of the law, will not apply to the DTAAs. The DTAAs are a bilateral agreement between two Countries and cannot be overridden by a unilateral legislative amendment by one Country (New Skies Satellite BV 382 ITR 114 (Del) & Siemens AG 310 ITR 320 (Bom) followed).

Please Click Here to View Full Post with File Download Link

Reply

Scroll to Top

Discover more from TAX CONCEPT

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading