Bombay High Court’s Judgement on Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act: Essar Shipping Limited vs CIT

COURT: Bombay High Court

CORAM: Milind D. Jadhav J, Ujjal Bhuyan J

SECTION(S): 28(iv)

GENRE: Domestic Tax

CATCH WORDS: subsidy, waiver of loan

COUNSEL: P. C. Chhotaray, P. C. Tripathi, Subhash S. Shetty

DATE: March 5, 2020 (Date of pronouncement)

DATE: June 26, 2020 (Date of publication)

AY: 1984-85

CITATION:

[ihc-hide-content ihc_mb_type=”show” ihc_mb_who=”2″ ihc_mb_template=”1″ ]

Section 28(iv): The Dept’s argument that the waiver of a loan constitutes an operational subsidy which is taxable is not correct. There is a fundamental difference between “loan” and “subsidy” & the two concepts cannot be equated. While “loan” is a borrowing of money required to be repaid back with interest; “subsidy” is not required to be repaid back being a grant. Such grant is given as part of a public policy by the state in furtherance of public interest. Therefore, even if a “loan” is written off or waived, which can be for various reasons, it cannot partake the character of a “subsidy”. The waiver of a loan cannot be brought to tax u/s 28(iv) of the Act.

Please Click Here to View Full Post with File Download Link

[/ihc-hide-content]